Technopaideia

Dynamically developing networked digital environments are shaping a new type of hybrid subjectivity and community based on, among other things, embodied simulation, transversality, immersivity and metaversum. In other words, this is what the student already comes to school ‘equipped’ with to some extent. Meanwhile, current Polish Language and Literature education forces students to adopt and develop a cognitive model that is alien to them and quite anachronistic, based on media environments from the 20th or even 19th century. This dissonance has a negative impact on a young person’s ability and willingness to acquire and develop a sensibility based on the literariness of the world. Advances in technology are also increasingly influencing educational methods, as well as the subject of study and research itself – i.e. literature and the ways in which it is received, and are reshaping the multidimensional model of the literary field (sociology of literature). Despite the fact that literature is increasingly operating in new media ecosystems (new literacies), the educational paths in Polish Studies classes are not designed to meet the new competences of students, which emanate from the fundamental changes in social life, and innovative tools are used by Polish Language and Literature teachers selectively and usually at an elementary level. There are also few ideas for the use of technologically advanced “Literature Labs”, which would become fully functional equivalents of school laboratories. Teachers are mostly expected to replace traditional teaching tools with digital ones. The use of robots, ozobots, VR goggles and gamification models is occasional. Elements of programming are still seen as unnecessary fantasy in Polish Language and Literature lessons. This in no way opens students up to the multimodality of contemporary literature and art, to its inherent polysensoriality, polyphony and spatiality, nor does it build an interpretative workshop tailored to the cultural reality of the 21st century, and ultimately does not enable them to find in mono-media literature values that are relevant to modern man. This does not create the conditions for a creative reinterpretation of literary classics, of these great books, and thus for an active use of cultural heritage. After all, literature is no longer based solely on the letter, but also on kinaesthetic, multi-sensory spatial experience, immersion, interactivity, and even causality and secondary orality, i.e. everything that we owe, among other things, to advanced technologies and the processes of mediatisation.

Technopaideia offers an answer to these challenges of contemporary education. It is a modern educational model developed by the OMBEiK team, which uses advanced information technology tools and elements of STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Math) education in the processes of teaching Polish language and literature. The constructivist-connectivist STEM model offers to the Polish Language and Literature educator many valuable teaching methods and tools, such as model-based inquiry, game-based learning, exploration technologies, connected learning and bifocal modelling. In the case of Polish Studies education, technopaideia would consist of integrating advanced technologies and elements of the STEM model into the didactic process in such a way that they enable pupils and students to expand their interpretative competences, e.g. with multimodality, polysensoriality, causality, embodied thinking related to kinesthetic acts and the sense of space (e.g. the use of VR motion sensors), which are important for contemporary literature. Paideia itself is also, in this view, more than education. It is about introducing people to being in a community of a whole new type, to interact in solidarity within it, to skilfully share and use knowledge from different disciplines and subjects. This, in turn, implies a kind of transversal mindfulness capable of moving seamlessly between different modalities, disciplines, discourses and ultimately breaking down the barriers between science and art and between science and humanitas; a mind capable of consciously and critically existing between and in different worlds. Technopaideia is thus based on the practice of creative use of innovative technologies (e.g. interactive virtual reality experience) in the interpretation of literary texts, but according to the cognitive specificity of the humanities. Our assumption is that these technologies must not have an appropriating or destructive effect on the non-empirical model of truth on which, among other things, the sciences of literature are founded. At the same time, technopaideia would be part of a philosophy of education in which high-tech and digital environments behind it become the starting point for thinking about how they influence the process of shaping, profiling and broadening students’ cognitive skills.

As part of technopaideia, we are also considering the creative use and readaptation of labs for the teaching of Polish Studies aimed, after all, at sustaining specifically human forms of sensibility rooted in literature, or more broadly, in language (media labs, mission labs, labs in a cloud). A question occurs here on how to draw inspiration from “literature labs” and create idea labs, interpretation space called @goras, in which students would use the strategy of embodied simulation, scrum and the concept of start-ups – i.e. impermanent team initiatives to solve specific challenges posed to them by, for example, performative action, robot theatre, cyber theatre or media experiments?

Author:
Sebastian Borowicz
Publication date:
22/01/2022

High-tech schools

High-tech schools are units based on the achievements of STEM education, equipped with so-called laboratories in which basically only one, empirically oriented cognitive model is nurtured and developed. The presence of advanced technologies is not limited here to the use of digital learning tools and aids (lab equipment, robots, cloudlabs, VR goggles, software development zones, interactive whiteboards and visualisers, in-house e-learning platforms). They are being significantly integrated into the learning process itself, including links to the design of learning space. Suffice it to mention the PlayMaker School in Santa Monica, schools belonging to the ALT School network (San Fransisco) and Quest2learn (New York), the Kastelli School in Oulu and the Scuola Centro Civico (SCC) in Turin. In Poland, high-tech schools are being established thanks to, among others, the Laboratories of the Future programme carried out in cooperation with the GovTech Centre. An important role is also played by the programme Discovery, Imagination and Activity Zone SOWA, which consists of independent units operating in the regions and cooperating with the Copernicus Science Centre, equipped with, among other things, workshop space, the so-called Majsternia. They are the equivalent of the maker labs known from American schools: rooms designed for experiments in science and technical subjects. However, we rarely hear about similar types of space created for humanities subjects. If they do exist, they are modelled on the idea of labs. Thus, the website laboratoriaszkolne.com offers not only the possibility of equipping biological and chemical laboratories, as part of the aforementioned Laboratory of the Future programme, but also presents ideas for history and language laboratories. The latter, however, are concerned with foreign language learning. Teaching aids, project aids, LaboLabs: “modular laboratories” are offered here. Also, the Malopolska Education Cloud programme envisaged for 2016-2023 assumes “a new model of teaching, implemented in a partnership formula in cooperation with eight universities” focusing on science subjects with the use of advanced technologies. However, units specialised in humanities (apart from those related to foreign language learning) are absent from the list of collaborating entities. Moreover, a new performative pedagogy is redefining cultural-literacy education in many countries along the lines of the detailed sciences. One such example are solutions developed by the Transformative Learning Technologies Lab team at Columbia University: transformative pedagogies and cultural making. Admittedly, it is necessary to develop the theoretical basis for innovative forms of education in humanities subjects adapted to the conditions of a highly mediatised information society and compatible with the developed didactics of technical and nature subjects, but these subjects must not become overly scientific.

STEM&HUM education

In highly developed countries, so-called high-tech schools, in which didactic and teaching processes are based on the STEM education model, are becoming increasingly popular. At the same time, based on this model new approaches in pedagogy in the teaching of humanities subjects such as the aforementioned transformative pedagogies and cultural making are being formulated. For at least a decade, the so-called new humanities have also been dominated by the metaphor of the lab. Experimental schools in the USA, Finland and Italy are successfully implementing education systems based on advanced information technology and technoscience. Thanks to the functional profiling of didactic processes through educational labs, game-based learning and connected learning, the teaching of natural and technical sciences has entered a new phase as a response to the mediatisation and technicisation of social life. Also in the case of humanities subjects (including the Polish Studies), it is becoming necessary to develop theoretical foundations for innovative forms of education adapted to the conditions of a highly mediatised information society, compatible with the developed didactics of science and natural science, all the more so as, thanks to the convergence processes, students begin to develop and build specific competences (e.g. transliteracy) and operate non-linear forms of thinking (hypertext, think digital and performative) already at the early school stage. These are areas of intellectual activity that are particularly relevant to humanities education (especially language and literature education).

So the basic question is: how do we adapt the methods, activities, tools and programmes developed for the aforementioned type of high-tech schools to the teaching of humanities subjects? One of the more popular answers is the STEAM education model; however, in this model the humanities (Arts) component has been subordinated to the cognitive specificity of science. In our view, it is far better to develop a theoretical basis for innovative forms of humanities subject education adapted to the conditions of a highly mediatised information society, compatible with the developed didactics of science and natural science and mathematics, so that they do not become overly scientific. Hence, within the framework of technopaideia, we propose to consider building HUM education model for the humanities, an education equivalent to STEM. Such a model using digital environments and advanced technologies would preserve and nurture the cognitive perspective inherent in the humanities. It is thus, in parallel, an attempt to build an inalienable humanistic, language and culture studies core into empirically oriented contemporary education. The truth that is sought within the framework of science is something fundamentally different from the one which literature from Gilgamesh to technopoetry seems to be concerned with. Our task is to ensure that cognition in the literature and culture studies sense is not completely suppressed by cognition in the sense of natural science in school (or academic) education. It is on literature, regardless of the media it uses, within the framework of the specific language it uses, that human subjectivity can be built and the communal needs of the individual realised. STEM and HUM education would have the opportunity to meet within a system of interdisciplinary modules linking labs and @goras in schools, creating a mutually complementary space of intellectual reflection and research praxis. This would enable the formation and development of a polyhistorical, transversal mindset enabling students to move as freely as possible across the many (in traditional terms) disparate areas of learning, and to build and sustain a humanistic sensibility in an age of technicised societies. Connectivity, dialogicity and communication between the specifics of the individual subjects, building a common “language” of science seem to be the basis for innovative education now and in the near future.

Click here

2023 OMBEiK. All right reserved.

designed by mocio.co